Long Beach Neighborhoods First
  • Home
  • LB HUSH2
    • Did You Know?
    • LGB Feasibility Study
    • 6/4/15 Community Meeting Video
    • City Documentation
    • Long Beach Airport History
    • Letter to Mayor
  • Mean Streets Of LB
  • Blogs
    • LBNF Blog
    • LB HUSH2 Blog
    • CARP Blog
  • Hot Topics
    • Assessment of Jacobs FIS Feasibility Study
    • Upcoming Meetings
    • City Projects 2015
    • City Documentation
    • LGB Fact Sheet
  • LB City Council
  • Groups & more...
    • Links >
      • LB Report Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Assessment of Jacobs FIS Feasibility Study

January 24th, 2018

1/24/2018

 
  At the direction of 4th district Councilmember Daryl Supernaw, with the support of city attorney Charles Parkin, our airport manager has been instructed to develop a plan for increasing late night  fines for those commercial carriers violating our 1995 noise ordinance. 

A new fine structure may look good on paper or in sound bites, but could it jeopardize what we have had in place for the past 27 years?

Jet Blue is the #1 offender of these late night flights with 110 violations in 2016 and 233 violations in 2017.  The total for all four other carriers in 2016 was 9 violations, in 2017 a grand total of 14 for the current five additional carriers. 

Some of you may not know that Jet Blue is under a 2003 consent decree that now allows $6K fine for each offense. In 2016, Jet Blue paid over $510K in fines and by November 2017 they had paid over $1.2M.  Since it appeared that these dollars simply became a part of their doing business at LGB, our city prosecutor renegotiated what was meant to offer Jet Blue the incentive to reduce those late night flights.  Instead, after agreeing to the new fine levels of $6K per offense, Jet Blue has challenged their obligation.  On what ground?  They say that their interpretation of our noise ordinance allows for this to occur without penalty. 

Page 3 - LBMC 16.43
Violations occurring during the period between ten p.m. and eleven p.m. which are the result of unanticipated delays beyond their reasonable control of the aircraft Owner/Operator shall be waived upon the presentation of evidence satisfactory to the Airport Manager that the delayed arrival or departure resulted from such circumstances. Delays caused by mechanical failure (but not by routine maintenance), by weather conditions or by air traffic control conditions will be considered beyond the Owner/Operator’s control.

Jet Blue is arguing that if a JB aircraft is held up in Seattle for their flight to JFK due to air traffic control issues and thereby delays the scheduled flight from JFK - LGB they are not to blame. 

It is our opinion that it is the carriers responsibility to arrange for proper aircraft utilization throughout their system.  The flight that begins in Seattle is obviously not a connecting flight to Long Beach, CA. 

This appeal is working its way to city council for their decision on March 13th, 2018.  Should the city council deny their appeal ( and yes they should) JB will move up the legal ladder to the FAA and the courts.  What impact could this action have on our coveted noise ordinance?  Two merging LGB issues ( the Jet Blue appeal and the LGB fine increases) meet head on putting our neighborhood communities at great risk.

I do not believe that any seated elected official wants  their legacy to be that their move(s) destroyed our noise ordinance!!  Do let them know how you feel prior to the 3/13 hearing.

Please pass the word and mark your calendars to attend this very important hearing. 

There are two additional community meetings for public input on the proposed fine increases.  They are on
Wednesday, February 7th 6:00p.m. at Gas & Oil and Saturday, February 10th, 10a.m. at The EXPO.






Kevin
1/25/2018 04:55:36 pm

I am confused. Is JetBlue arguing the $6k fine structure from 2003, or a more recent change to that structure that made all violations $6k? I guess I am wondering if we already fiddled with things and asked for trouble.

Rae Gabelich
1/25/2018 11:08:47 pm

HI Kevin! JB is challenging the consent decree fines that were reevaluated last summer with our city prosecutor, Doug Haubert. Because of the significant increase in flight violations City Prosecutor Haubert increased the fine levels to be $6K beginning with the first offense as opposed to the 6th. Shortly after that agreement was reached JB filed their appeal with the LGB Director stating that they interpreted our ordinance to read differently. They challenge LBMC 16.43 Section B " Delays caused by mechanical failure(but not by routine maintenance), by weather conditions or by air traffic control conditions will be beyond the Owner/Operator's control." They state that they believe that if one of their flights is delayed by ATC they are exempt. What they are not saying is that the ATC impact was caused by another aircraft serving another destination not having to do with the new flight originating in JFK/BOS to LGB. Our argument is they are not adequately staffed with aircraft to fulfill their scheduling efforts across their system. The courts will decide........

Rosa Carrillo
1/26/2018 08:06:55 am

So what are you asking us to communicate? Are we for or against the fine increases? Are any council members leaning towards JB? Please clarify.


Comments are closed.

    LB HUSH2

    Conversations and information about LGB airport issues.

    Get Involved!

    We're looking for members to continue to grow our community outreach.
    Apply to HUSH

    Archives

    January 2018
    March 2017
    February 2017

Long Beach Neighborhoods First Supported by LBHUSH2